FZ1 Owners...Pros/Cons (2024)

NorthOfDallas said:

you looking at new, or first gen (02-05)?

Click to expand...

I read about some of the changes but is it really that different a bike from genI and genII?

I just bought one and love it. It is a 2006 with a Micron pipe and Corbin seat.

This bike has great power and handling.

jredford said:

I just bought one and love it. It is a 2006 with a Micron pipe and Corbin seat.

This bike has great power and handling.

Click to expand...

Comfort? Clean wind? I know the short windshield doesn't do much, maybe keep wind off your chest, but is the air on the helmet clean at freeway speeds?

Jnap.. wht part of spring are you in?

I can let ya sit on a first gen if you want.

ulric said:

Jnap.. wht part of spring are you in?

I can let ya sit on a first gen if you want.

Click to expand...

Cypresswood, across from Smith Elementary. About 4 miles east of 45.

jnappier said:

Comfort? Clean wind? I know the short windshield doesn't do much, maybe keep wind off your chest, but is the air on the helmet clean at freeway speeds?

Click to expand...

No problems with the wind which really surprised me. Very comfortable have put in several 500 mi days.

jnappier said:

I am considering an FZ1 as my next bike. I would like to hear the good and the bad about the bike from current and previous owners.

Click to expand...

I've ridden extensively both first and second generation. The first gen is carb based but is actually more comfortable in terms of ergonomics very good for long-distance riding. I road one with Ohlins suspension. It was a superb ride with ample amount of performance and power.

Consider it a FJR on steroids!

The second generation started in 2006. They had some fuel injection problems and you had to make some tweaks to resolve the throttle snatch. The 2009 FZ1 models have all the known issues resolved but the ergonomics for long-distance riding are not as good as the first gen.

The R1 like engine is superb and is time-tested.

RB

jnappier said:

I read about some of the changes but is it really that different a bike from genI and genII?

Click to expand...

If you believe what's in the magazines, the frist generation had less hit at the top end, but lots of midrange grunt while the newer one has more power at the top and less midrange. Basically, You have to rev the newer engine to get the power, but there's more on tap.

I currently have a 01. But I don't get to ride it much. I had a 02 I took to Wyoming in July. I averaged upper forty's mpg and could go 215 miles comfortably. I preferred the wind over a goldwing was not nearly as hot. You do get heat on your right leg from the motor. The power on demand is awesome. I never had carb troubles I think if you maintain them you shouldn't have any probs. I used soft luggage but they do make hard luggage kits for them.

The bad. It likes to wheelie and goes fast!

If you want to ride a first gen your welcome to take it for a spin.

jar675 said:

I currently have a 01. But I don't get to ride it much.

Click to expand...

...cuz I take it as my daily commuter. With a top case on it, it's perfect for daily riding in traffic and will hold everything I need to get to work and back, go to the store for a few things, etc.

I miss riding my V-Strom in traffic though just because it looked "meaner" and people got out of my way faster.

jar675 said:

If you want to ride a first gen your welcome to take it for a spin.

Click to expand...

Hmmm...

jar675 said:

If you want to ride a first gen your welcome to take it for a spin.

Click to expand...

Thanks, maybe on the weekend we could meet and swap rides. Which of my bikes would you want to ride?

Red Brown said:

I've ridden extensively both first and second generation. The first gen is carb based but is actually more comfortable in terms of ergonomics very good for long-distance riding. I road one with Ohlins suspension. It was a superb ride with ample amount of performance and power.

I would opt for the first gen for this reason.

Consider it a FJR on steroids!

The second generation started in 2006. They had some fuel injection problems and you had to make some tweaks to resolve the throttle snatch. The 2009 FZ1 models have all the known issues resolved but the ergonomics for long-distance riding are not as good as the first gen.

The R1 like engine is superb and is time-tested.

RB

Click to expand...

Nice response and nice bike. Thanks

I picked up an '09 FZ1 last month. I have owned many motorcycles, and find the Fizzy to be a better Bandit. A proverbial Wolf in Sheep's clothing. Tough to quantify, but I find the Fizzy to be a bit sharper than the Bandit. That includes being more "peaky" in the power-band, but it will pull and pull hard at about 6K RPMs. Like the Bandit, the Fizzy can be outfitted for the long haul, or as a respectable track bike. The suspension is more taught than the Bandit, and that gives me better feedback, inspiring more confidence. Gas mileage is kind of crummy, only getting into Honda Accord territory at 35 mpg. However, it has just had the first service but is not considered "broke-in" until after 1K miles. I expect to get about 42 mpg, and that is on par with my Concours 14. If I am careful I can get near 50 mpg on my daily commute, but for weekend riding at a spirited pace it is always less.

There will be others that see the Bandit as the better bike, and I would not say that they are wrong. For me I wanted a bike in the garage with respectable performance that I could take to the track and not be folded up like origami. It gave me the best option for something that would not be so narrow in focus that I would not enjoy riding it on a daily basis on the street.

Red Brown said:

I've ridden extensively both first and second generation. The first gen is carb based but is actually more comfortable in terms of ergonomics very good for long-distance riding. I road one with Ohlins suspension. It was a superb ride with ample amount of performance and power.

I would opt for the first gen for this reason.

Consider it a FJR on steroids!
but the ergonomics for long-distance riding are not as good as the first gen.

The R1 like engine is superb and is time-tested.

RB

Click to expand...

What he said. I get 40-ish regularly with the Dale's Holeshot Stage 2 kit, the yosh, K&N and such. I've never had fueling problems at all, but the alternator doesnt like the heated grips on 100% of the time, so I put it on a minder in the winter overnights.

The maintenance intervals are great too...26k for valves. THe only thing not really mentioned enough is the Exup maintenance - which is stupid easy.

Mine happens to eat oil. Some do, most don't. I go thru +/- 3 qts between changes, others won't use a drop.

One last point...I got my first-ever speeding ticket on a bike since 1990...ON THE FZ; believe that it like you to dig in.

jnappier said:

I read about some of the changes but is it really that different a bike from genI and genII?

Click to expand...

Totally different bikes - Carbs to FI, Steel Tubular Frame to Aluminum Spar, Completely different motor, Different seating positions..

Both are great bikes, and the 2nd Gen's need a few more tuning tweaks than the first gens to run right.

Ghost Rider said:

I picked up an '09 FZ1 last month. I have owned many motorcycles, and find the Fizzy to be a better Bandit. A proverbial Wolf in Sheep's clothing. Tough to quantify, but I find the Fizzy to be a bit sharper than the Bandit. That includes being more "peaky" in the power-band, but it will pull and pull hard at about 6K RPMs. Like the Bandit, the Fizzy can be outfitted for the long haul, or as a respectable track bike. The suspension is more taught than the Bandit, and that gives me better feedback, inspiring more confidence. QUOTE]

Ditto. Having owned a Bandit and ridden the FZ1 I can agree. The Yam is a much better machine alround. It just feels like a newer motorcycle than the Bandit, sharper and more responsive. I think that build quality of the Yamaha is better too. I bought the wrong one.

Click to expand...